In the weeks preceding our nation's two national political party extravaganzas, congress voted by a wide margin to extend unemployment benefits an extra 26 weeks. How fitting. What would free circuses be without free bread?
It was expected that the Republican Convention would greatly surpass the Democratic Convention in lies per minute. After all, the Democrats only had to lie about what they intended to do ))) the Republicans had also to lie about what they have done over the last 12 years ))) and what they have done is a crime of unfathomable magnitude.
Certainly the Republican claim of the final defeat of world wide communism sounded impressive to almost every person listening. The truth in this matter is far different. If the American public could learn in sufficient numbers what was behind this charade, there would be an outcry for Nuremburg)type trials and the demand for capital punishment for Bush and his accomplices.
Contrary to the lies of Dan Rather and Ted Kopel, there was nothing spontaneous or unexpected about the fall of communism in Eastern Europe or the Soviet Union. In fact, proving this was all planned 18 years in advance is rather simple. Col. L. Fletcher Prouty sent me a document which was never intended to reach the public domain. This was the program for a highly unpublicized conference held February 7)9, 1972 in Washington, D.C. It was entitled, A LOOK AT BUSINESS IN 1990: A SUMMARY OF THE WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE ON THE INDUSTRIAL WORLD AHEAD. This conference, staged during the term of President Richard Nixon, brought together 1,800 Chief Executive Officers of every major U.S. multinational corporation with their counterparts from the USSR and the eastern bloc nations. This event was unprecedented in all of human history. As Col. Prouty stated "These CEOs came themselves, they didn't send their flunkies".
These sessions were chaired by Maurice Stans, Nixon's Secretary of Commerce, who retired immediately after the conference to dedicate the rest of his career to marring the industrial interests of East and West. A similar conference has been held every subsequent year. One such conference was going on in Moscow precisely when the downing of Korean Airliner 007 was blamed on the USSR.
As Ronald Reagan was denouncing the USSR as "An Evil Empire" Senator Robert Dole was reading a letter from Reagan to this group which said essentially ))) "Let us all trade together and make tons of money". The Soviet leaders knew Reagan's fiery rhetoric was intended only for domestic consumption. Why not take the blame for KA 007 ))) after all, the USSR was getting exactly what it wanted most in the world. In the US the downing of KA 007 was the foundation of Reagan's effort to successfully double the defence budget. As Prouty has stated "Never has one incident involved more lies and made more money."
In this program, under the title CHANGES IN ECONOMIC SYSTEMS, is a cogent paragraph by Roy Ash, the CEO of the major defence contractor LITTON INDUSTRIES. Ash is presenting the conference conclusions of the summary session. I quote in full. "Mr. Ash began the discussion with a statement that state capitalism may well be a form for world business in the world ahead; that the western countries are trending toward a more unified and controlled economy, having a greater effect on all business; and the communist nations are moving more and more toward a free market system. The question posed, on which a number of divergent opinions arose, was whether CCEast and West would meet some place toward the middle about 1990DD." They hit their prediction right on the head ))) 18 years in advance!
Turning communism off is no great difficulty if yours is the power group which turned communism on in the first place. I am going to spare the essay on how John D. Rockefeller, Prescott Bush and the wealthiest men in the world bankrolled international communism. I think this readership understands that.
Subtracting "the defeat of communism" from George Bush's accomplishments does not leave much. Chuck Harder, founder of WE THE PEOPLE RADIO NETWORK has arranged reprints of the PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER series AMERICA WHAT WENT WRONG? (Chuck will send 25 reprints to your door for a $25 check made payable to WE THE PEOPLE P.O. Box T, White Springs, Florida 32096.) This paper is perhaps the most powerful tool for explaining the current crimes against the American public. In words understandable to the average citizen the whole ugly truth of how America was dismantled is all there. I recommend this purchase and distribution to friends. And, if anyone doubts that the dismantling of America was not cold blooded and premeditated, readers should find Buckminster Fuller's book CRITICAL PATH, an unheeded warning of this very thing written more than 40 years ago!
AMERICA, WHAT WENT WRONG? PART ONE: DISMANTLING THE MIDDLE CLASS presents graphic statistics. If the Reagan\Bush years 1980 to 1990 are considered, according to IRS, income for those making $20,000 to $50,000 went up 44%, (just barely keeping even with inflation). For those earning salaries of $200,000 to $1,000,000, income went up 697%. Those making more than $1,000,000 a year (for the most part the friends of Reagan and Bush) received a 2,184% increase! These "friends" making more than a million a year in 1980 were making $21 million a year in 1990! This is more than obscene. It is criminal. It may never be reversible.
From where did these windfalls come? They came from the multitudes making less than $20,000 a year. This group was devastated. Many who were making $16 and $18 per hour had difficulty finding jobs making $6 per hour ))) this primarily the result of multinationals moving jobs out of the country.
Not only is it a right to accumulate wealth but a responsibility. There are many who speak of being free but true freedom begins after one has accumulated enough capital to live securely off the interest. This only begins after a net worth of about $600,000. That is the beginning of owning oneself. Conservatives understand this principal well. That is why most conservatives fall within an income range of $60,000 to $500,000 a year. Those making more than this tend to drift to the methods of making money by coopting government for their purposes. These individuals, once they have discovered the public trough are usually lost to the conservative cause. While there was still some political contest between conservatives and Eastern Establishment Liberals, it was Barry Goldwater who represented the small millionaire class and Nelson Rockefeller who represented the billionaire class.
While the lowest economic classes were plundered, this nation's ruling class bought off the conservative class with substantial bribes. Although the range selected for this comparison does not coincide precisely with the conservative income range and tends to be skewed to the high end, one gets an idea that conservatives were paid off but not as well as the elitists paid off themselves. But heed this warning. Conservatives will be the final victims of the Eastern Liberal Establishment after the less advantaged classes have been sufficiently weakened. And final days are coming. If conservatives do not make an effort to stand up for the rights of all players to compete on a level playing field, when the final confrontation comes, alone, conservatives will be easy pickings.
The Republican and the Democratic parties are one party masquerading as two. It matters not to the international bankers whether our government over spends on useless defence or over spends on useless social programs. I see only one solution. INDEPENDENT CANDIDATES. Our founding fathers never intended these political parties. I have proposed a guest column this issue featuring the brilliant political strategist, Earnest Hancock. Hancock is challenging the unlevel playing field created by the two monopoly parties which severly disadvantages non aligned candidates.
While my columns tend to detail WHAT political crimes are occurring, Earnest Hancock details HOW these crimes are committed. Only when one know HOW can one remedy the political process. This is why what he is saying is far more important than anything I say. It is only a matter of time before his prescriptions succeed. I invite you to read his column.
No one has dared utter the reason H. Ross Perot was ordered to cease and desist. All across the nation citizens supporting Perot were spontaneously constructing an alternative to the Republican and Democratic parties. But this grouping of people, tired of going to the polls and having the choice of polio or cancer, were proving to be more and more impossible for Perot to control from Dallas. The possibility that this organization would emerge next election as a force to contend with the monopoly parties was down right frightening to the powers that be. If the ruling class thought a third party was frightening )*) wait until they find out what Ernie Hancock has in mind.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment